Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 95
Filter
2.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 280(8): 3515-3528, 2023 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2299917

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: COVID-19 can result in an extensive range of extrapulmonary, and neurological signs and symptoms such as olfactory and/or taste dysfunction, and otologic symptoms. The aim of this study was to investigate the hearing loss manifestation from COVID-19. METHODS: The goal of this umbrella review was to examine hearing loss associated with COVID-19 disease. English literature published until October 15, 2022 in online databases including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase was considered for this purpose. Eligibility of the articles for subsequent data extraction was evaluated in a two-step selection process with consideration to an inclusion/exclusion criterion. This review followed the PRISMA protocol and the Amstar-2 checklist for quality assessment. RESULTS: A total of four treatment strategies were used by different studies which included oral corticosteroids, intratympanic corticosteroids, combined oral and intratympanic corticosteroids, and hyperbaric oxygen therapy. Five studies investigated corticosteroid use in the forms of oral or intratympanic injection; four studies reported (complete or partial) hearing improvements after steroid treatment, while one study stated no significant improvement in hearing function. One study reported that oral corticosteroid monotherapy alone was not effective, while vestibular symptoms were ameliorated by a combination of oral prednisone, intratympanic dexamethasone injection, and hydroxychloroquine. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that despite being one of the rare complications of COVID-19, hearing loss can impact a patient's quality of life. The most common type reported was sensorineural hearing loss, which can be diagnosed with variable techniques.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Deafness , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural , Hearing Loss, Sudden , Humans , Hearing Loss, Sudden/diagnosis , Quality of Life , COVID-19/complications , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/diagnosis , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , Injection, Intratympanic , Treatment Outcome , Dexamethasone/therapeutic use , Glucocorticoids/therapeutic use
3.
JMIR Public Health Surveill ; 9: e45263, 2023 Jul 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2304706

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization recently described sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) as a possible adverse effect of COVID-19 vaccines. Recent discordant pharmacoepidemiologic studies invite robust clinical investigations of SSNHL after COVID-19 messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines. This postmarketing surveillance study, overseen by French public health authorities, is the first to clinically document postvaccination SSNHL and examine the role of potential risk factors. OBJECTIVE: This nationwide study aimed to assess the relationship between SSNHL and exposure to mRNA COVID-19 vaccines and estimate the reporting rate (Rr) of SSNHL after mRNA vaccination per 1 million doses (primary outcome). METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of all suspected cases of SSNHL after mRNA COVID-19 vaccination spontaneously reported in France between January 2021 and February 2022 based on a comprehensive medical evaluation, including the evaluation of patient medical history, side and range of hearing loss, and hearing recovery outcomes after a minimum period of 3 months. The quantification of hearing loss and assessment of hearing recovery outcomes were performed according to a grading system modified from the Siegel criteria. A cutoff of 21 days was used for the delay onset of SSNHL. The primary outcome was estimated using the total number of doses of each vaccine administered during the study period in France as the denominator. RESULTS: From 400 extracted cases for tozinameran and elasomeran, 345 (86.3%) spontaneous reports were selected. After reviewing complementary data, 49.6% (171/345) of documented cases of SSNHL were identified. Of these, 83% (142/171) of SSNHL cases occurred after tozinameran vaccination: Rr=1.45/1,000,000 injections; no difference for the rank of injections; complete recovery in 22.5% (32/142) of cases; median delay onset before day 21=4 days (median age 51, IQR 13-83 years); and no effects of sex. A total of 16.9% (29/171) of SSNHL cases occurred after elasomeran vaccination: Rr=1.67/1,000,000 injections; rank effect in favor of the first injection (P=.03); complete recovery in 24% (7/29) of cases; median delay onset before day 21=8 days (median age 47, IQR 33-81 years); and no effects of sex. Autoimmune, cardiovascular, or audiovestibular risk factors were present in approximately 29.8% (51/171) of the cases. SSNHL was more often unilateral than bilateral for both mRNA vaccines (P<.001 for tozinameran; P<.003 for elasomeran). There were 13.5% (23/142) of cases of profound hearing loss, among which 74% (17/23) did not recover a serviceable ear. A positive rechallenge was documented for 8 cases. CONCLUSIONS: SSNHL after COVID-19 mRNA vaccines are very rare adverse events that do not call into question the benefits of mRNA vaccines but deserve to be known given the potentially disabling impact of sudden deafness. Therefore, it is essential to properly characterize postinjection SSNHL, especially in the case of a positive rechallenge, to provide appropriate individualized recommendations.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural , Hearing Loss, Sudden , Humans , Middle Aged , Hearing Loss, Sudden/etiology , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , BNT162 Vaccine , 2019-nCoV Vaccine mRNA-1273 , Pharmacovigilance , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/complications , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/complications , Vaccination/adverse effects
4.
BMJ Case Rep ; 16(4)2023 Apr 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2295544

ABSTRACT

A woman in her 30s was referred to an otolaryngologist with an acute onset of aural fullness, noise sensitivity, unilateral sudden onset hearing loss, vertigo and tinnitus. She had a confirmed COVID-19 infection 5 weeks prior. A pure tone audiogram confirmed sensorineural hearing loss. MRI identified an empty sella of the pituitary gland and without an obvious cause for hearing loss. Oral prednisolone and betahistine were prescribed, and her audiovestibular symptoms slowly improved over the subsequent months. The patient continues to experience intermittent tinnitus.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural , Hearing Loss, Sudden , Tinnitus , Female , Humans , Tinnitus/drug therapy , Tinnitus/etiology , COVID-19/complications , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/diagnosis , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/drug therapy , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/etiology , Hearing Loss, Sudden/diagnosis , Hearing Loss, Sudden/drug therapy , Hearing Loss, Sudden/etiology , Vertigo
6.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 280(8): 3609-3613, 2023 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2259269

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Previous data demonstrated an increased incidence of Idiopathic Sensorineural Hearing Loss (ISSNHL) in 2021 compared to 2019-2020, suggesting an association with the anti-COVID-19 vaccine. We aimed to assess our center's incidence and compare the clinical manifestations and outcomes of vaccinated vs. unvaccinated patients. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of all patients diagnosed with ISSNHL during 2021 was conducted and compared to patients who presented in 2018-2020. Patient demographics, audiometry features, vaccination status, and prognosis were evaluated. RESULTS: Throughout 2021, 51 patients were diagnosed with ISSNHL, compared with 31 during 2020, 38 in 2019, and 41 in 2018, demonstrating a 64%, 34%, and 24% increase, respectively. Among patients who presented in 2021, 13 (25.4%) received the anti-COVID-19 vaccine within 30 days before their presentation, and 4 received it within 96 h. Most presented after receiving the second or third dose. Patient characteristics, audiometry features, and prognosis did not significantly differ between vaccinated and unvaccinated patients. CONCLUSIONS: A marked incline was seen in the 2021 ISSNHL incidence at our medical center, of which 25% of cases were within a month post-anti-COVID-19 vaccination. No significant difference was found in clinical manifestations and outcomes between vaccinated and nonvaccinated patients. While other justifications could be sought, an association cannot be ruled out, and further research is needed.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural , Hearing Loss, Sudden , Vaccines , Humans , Retrospective Studies , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Prognosis , Hearing Loss, Sudden/diagnosis , Hearing Loss, Sudden/epidemiology , Hearing Loss, Sudden/etiology , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/diagnosis , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/epidemiology , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/etiology
7.
medrxiv; 2023.
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppzbmed-10.1101.2023.02.26.23286471

ABSTRACT

In the fourth year of the COVID-19 pandemic, public health authorities worldwide have adopted a strategy of learning to live with SARS-CoV-2. This has involved the removal of measures for limiting viral spread, resulting in a large burden of recurrent SARS-CoV-2 infections. Crucial for managing this burden is the concept of the so-called wall of hybrid immunity, through repeated reinfections and vaccine boosters, to reduce the risk of severe disease and death. Protection against both infection and severe disease is provided by the induction of neutralizing antibodies (nAbs) against SARS-CoV-2. However, pharmacokinetic (PK) waning and rapid viral evolution both degrade nAb binding titers. The recent emergence of variants with strongly immune evasive potential against both the vaccinal and natural immune responses raises the question of whether the wall of population-level immunity can be maintained in the face of large jumps in nAb binding potency. Here we use an agent-based simulation to address this question. Our findings suggest large jumps in viral evolution may cause failure of population immunity resulting in sudden increases in mortality. As a rise in mortality will only become apparent in the weeks following a wave of disease, reactive public health strategies will not be able to provide meaningful risk mitigation. Learning to live with the virus could thus lead to large death tolls with very little warning. Our work points to the importance of proactive management strategies for the ongoing pandemic, and to the need for multifactorial approaches to COVID-19 disease control.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome , Death , Hearing Loss, Sudden
8.
Am J Otolaryngol ; 44(2): 103725, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2242602

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Anecdotal reports of sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) following COVID-19 vaccination have emerged in the otolaryngology community. Studies have demonstrated no association between COVID-19 vaccination and SSNHL. We aim to characterize the spectrum of otologic symptoms following COVID-19 vaccination. METHODS: A cross-sectional study of patients seen in the otology clinic at an academic center was performed. Patients completed a questionnaire on the development of new otologic symptoms within 4 weeks of COVID-19 vaccination. Diagnostic and audiometric data was collected retrospectively for patients reporting otologic symptoms. RESULTS: Between May and July 2021, 500 patients were screened. Median age was 56.6 years old, with 59.4 % female and 40.2 % male. 420 patients (84.0 %) were vaccinated, with 58.4 % receiving Pfizer, 29.1 % receiving Moderna, and 3.8 % receiving Johnson & Johnson. 61 patients (14.5 %) reported one or more otologic symptoms within 4 weeks of vaccination, including 21 (5.0 %) with hearing loss, 26 (6.2 %) with tinnitus, 33 (7.9 %) with dizziness, and 19 (4.5 %) with vertigo. Of the 16 patients (3.2 %) reporting tinnitus with no associated hearing loss, 8 were diagnosed with subjective tinnitus and 4 were diagnosed with temporomandibular joint syndrome. Of the 18 patients reporting hearing loss, 11 had exacerbations of underlying pathologies (e.g. Meniere's disease, presbycusis) and 7 were newly diagnosed with SSNHL (1.4 %). CONCLUSIONS: Patients reporting otologic symptoms following COVID-19 vaccination received various diagnoses of uncertain etiology. The incidence of SSNHL in these patients is comparable to the general otology patient population. Additional studies are required to determine the incidence of specific diagnoses following vaccination.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Deafness , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural , Hearing Loss, Sudden , Tinnitus , Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Tinnitus/complications , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Cross-Sectional Studies , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/complications , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/epidemiology , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/etiology , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/diagnosis , Hearing Loss, Sudden/diagnosis , Vertigo/complications , Vaccination/adverse effects
9.
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 149(2): 133-140, 2023 02 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2233790

ABSTRACT

Importance: Spontaneous adverse reaction reports of sudden hearing loss have been observed, and a population-based cohort study conducted in Israel showed an increase in the incidence of sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) following vaccination with messenger RNA COVID-19 vaccine BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech). However, in this setting, the possibility of confounding remained. Objective: To assess a potential association between COVID-19 vaccinations and SSNHL. Design, Setting, and Participants: This register-based country-wide retrospective cohort study of 5.5 million Finnish residents was conducted from January 1, 2019, to April 20, 2022, and included all individuals who were identified from the population information system who were alive or born during the study period except individuals who had SSNHL during 2015 to 2018 according to specialized care derived diagnosis codes for SSNHL (International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision [ICD-10] code H91.2) as a primary or secondary diagnosis. Exposures: The a priori primary risk period was 0 to 54 days following each COVID-19 vaccination. The risk periods for different vaccine doses did not overlap so that a later vaccine exposure ended the previous risk period. The secondary risk period was from 55 days following each COVID-19 vaccination until a subsequent COVID-19 vaccination. A secondary analysis included a risk time from 0 to 54 days following a positive polymerase chain reaction test result for SARS-CoV-2. Main Outcomes and Measures: The incidences of SSNHL following COVID-19 vaccination were compared with the incidences before the COVID-19 epidemic in Finland. The Poisson regression model included calendar time, age, sex, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, other chronic diseases, and the number of visits in primary health care. Results: For the 5.5 million Finnish residents included in the study, the comparison time comprised 6.5 million person-years, the primary risk time of 1.7 million person-years, and the secondary risk time of 2.1 million person-years. Before the COVID-19 epidemic in Finland, 18.7/100 000 people received a diagnosis of SSNHL annually. The study data suggested no increased risk for SSNHL following any COVID-19 vaccination. In particular, adjusted incidence rate ratios with 95% confidence intervals for the BNT162b2 vaccine's 3 doses were 0.8 (95% CI, 0.6-1.0), 0.9 (95% CI, 0.6-1.2), and 1.0 (95% CI, 0.7-1.4), respectively. There was no association between SARS-CoV-2 infection and an increased incidence of SSNHL. Conclusions and Relevance: The results of this cohort study show no evidence of an increased risk of SSNHL following COVID-19 vaccination. The study accounted for previous disease and other potential confounding factors. These results are based on diagnosis codes in specialized care but still need to be verified in settings that are capable of evaluating the degree of hearing loss.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural , Hearing Loss, Sudden , Humans , BNT162 Vaccine , Cohort Studies , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/etiology , Hearing Loss, Sudden/etiology , Hearing Loss, Sudden/complications , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Vaccination/adverse effects
10.
Otol Neurotol ; 44(2): 126-133, 2023 02 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2190968

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There have been reports and studies indicating audiovestibular disturbances in COVID-19 patients with variations in the percentage of sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). The purpose of this study is to compare the incidence of newly diagnosed SNHL, sudden idiopathic hearing loss (SIHL), tinnitus, and vestibular disturbances between infected and uninfected patients, as well as to identify population groups at risk. METHODS: This study used TriNetX to obtain statistics on COVID-19 (+) and COVID-19 (-) patients from 61 healthcare organizations. Propensity score with 1:1 matching was used to control confounding variables. This study evaluated the relative risk of developing audiovestibular disturbances up to 1 month after a COVID-19 test and further investigated the incidence in COVID-19 (+) subset groups. RESULTS: Between COVID-19 (+) and COVID-19 (-) patients who had an audiogram, there was no statistically significant difference in SNHL or SIHL (SNHL: relative risk [RR] = 0.69, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.46-1.04; SIHL: RR = 1.00, 95% CI = 0.42-2.40). Race/ethnicity or specified comorbidity did not affect the incidence of SNHL or SIHL. There was a statistically significant difference in tinnitus and vestibular disturbances between the COVID-19 (+) and the COVID-19 (-) groups (RR = 1.29, 95% CI = 1.01-1.66; RR = 2.33, 95% CI = 2.19-2.48). CONCLUSION: New onset hearing loss is not more common in patients with a positive COVID-19 test than those with a negative COVID-19 test. Audiologic evaluation is needed to verify reported hearing disturbances. Although statistically significant in specific population groups, tinnitus and vestibular disturbances may not be clinically significant due to the low incidence.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural , Hearing Loss, Sudden , Tinnitus , Humans , Tinnitus/diagnosis , Tinnitus/epidemiology , Tinnitus/etiology , Dizziness/etiology , Dizziness/complications , COVID-19/complications , Vertigo/complications , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/diagnosis , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/epidemiology , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/etiology , Hearing Loss, Sudden/complications , Hearing
11.
Otol Neurotol ; 44(2): e68-e72, 2023 02 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2190966

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) incidence rates over the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak and the COVID-19 vaccination campaign periods to pre-COVID-19 periods. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. SETTING: Secondary hospital. PATIENTS: Patients >12 years with auditory-confirmed SSNHL were enrolled. COVID-19 status and BNT162 inoculation records ≤28 days before SSNHL diagnosis were retrieved. Patients were categorized according to their date of presentation over four equal periods: 1) July 2018-April 2019 (first prepandemic period), 2) May 2019-February 2020 (second prepandemic period), 3) March 2020-December 2020 (COVID-19 outbreak), and 4) January 2021-October 2021 (BNT162b2 vaccinations campaign). INTERVENTIONS: Pre- and post-COVID-19 emergence; BNT162b2 vaccine. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) were calculated to compare SSNHL cases during the COVID-19 and vaccination periods with pre-COVID-19 periods. RESULTS: Of the 100 patients with SSNHL over the four periods, 1 had COVID-19 and 8 were vaccinated. The annual SSNHL incidence was 12.87, 12.28, 13.45, and 19.89 per 100,000 over periods 1 to 4, respectively. SSNHL incidence over the third period was not significantly different than the first/second periods (IRR = 1.045, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.629-1.85, ρ = 0.788, and IRR = 1.095, 95% CI = 0.651-1.936, ρ = 0.683, respectively), whereas SSNHL incidence rate over the fourth period was higher (IRR = 1.545, 95% CI = 0.967-2.607, ρ = 0.068, and IRR = 1.619, 95% CI = 1-2.73, ρ = 0.05, respectively). SSNHL incidence in vaccine recipients was lower than prepandemic unvaccinated patients (IRR = 0.584, 95% CI =0.464-1.67, ρ = 0.984, and IRR = 0.612, 95% CI =0.48-1.744, ρ = 0.92, respectively). CONCLUSION: There were fewer SSNHL cases during the first COVID-19 months. Although the SSNHL rate over the COVID-19 vaccination campaign increased, it was not higher for patients who received the BNT162b2 vaccine.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural , Hearing Loss, Sudden , Humans , BNT162 Vaccine , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/epidemiology , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/etiology , Hearing Loss, Sudden/epidemiology , Hearing Loss, Sudden/etiology , Incidence , Retrospective Studies , Vaccines
12.
BMJ Case Rep ; 15(9)2022 Sep 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2019955

ABSTRACT

Hearing loss following COVID-19 infection has been scarcely reported in the literature.A previously well middle-aged man presented to the emergency department with breathlessness and cough 8 days after testing positive for COVID-19 in the community. The patient was treated in the intensive care unit due to respiratory failure. Following extubation and step down to ward-level care 2 months later, the patient reported sudden left-sided hearing loss and tinnitus. Ear examination was unremarkable and pure tone audiometry revealed profound left sensorineural hearing loss. MRI of the internal acoustic meatus did not show any cerebellopontine lesions. Intravenous steroid therapy as well as oral steroids were not successful in improvement of hearing.A few cases of COVID-19-associated sensorineural hearing loss have been reported; the majority report irreversible loss. Awareness of this phenomenon and early referral for specialist review and audiological assessment to attempt salvage of hearing can reduce hearing disability.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Deafness , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural , Hearing Loss, Sudden , Hearing Loss, Unilateral , Audiometry, Pure-Tone , COVID-19/complications , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/diagnosis , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/etiology , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/therapy , Hearing Loss, Sudden/diagnosis , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Steroids
13.
researchsquare; 2022.
Preprint in English | PREPRINT-RESEARCHSQUARE | ID: ppzbmed-10.21203.rs.3.rs-2078657.v1

ABSTRACT

Background: Covid–19 is a new pandemic infectious disease emerged in Wuhan, China at the end of 2019, we aimed to evaluate the Sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) prevalence after covid 19 infection or even vaccination.    Methods: Two-centre retrospective, observational cross-sectional study performed at tertiary care referral Audio-vestibular Medicine Units at the period between August 1st 2020 and October 31st 2021. All sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) patients diagnosed in a period of a month with Covid -19 or vaccinated with Covid -19 vaccine were participated in this study.  Results: Fifty-three cases with confirmed Covid -19 and one patient vaccinated with Covid -19 vaccine one week before, reported sudden sensory neural hearing loss were included in this study. forty-eight patients had unilateral hearing loss and 6 patients had bilateral hearing loss. Forty-nine patients with typical Covid -19 symptoms, one patient discovered after complaining of anosmia and ageusia, one patient after Covid -19 vaccination and three patient was complaining only from hearing loss and had PCR test for nasopharyngeal swapes to prove infection were participated in our study. Different degrees of SSNHL were ranged from mild to severe and most of the patients had severe hearing loss.  Conclusion:  With more patients, Covid-19 may be a potential factor in sudden sensorineural hearing loss. It should be kept in mind that SSNHL may be the only indicator used to identify Covid- 19 cases.


Subject(s)
Hearing Loss, Sensorineural , Hearing Loss, Bilateral , Communicable Diseases , Hearing Loss, Sudden , COVID-19 , Hearing Loss , Ageusia
15.
J Laryngol Otol ; 136(9): 823-826, 2022 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1947123

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine if otolaryngologists and audiologists of the American Academy of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery have noticed an increase in the incidence of sudden sensorineural hearing loss during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. METHODS: A questionnaire was developed for the purpose of providing a cross-sectional descriptive analysis of perceived association between the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic and an increase in the incidence of sudden sensorineural hearing loss. RESULTS: Of respondents, 63.0 per cent did not notice an increase in sudden sensorineural hearing loss during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. There was a weak positive correlation between patients identified with sudden sensorineural hearing loss and the percentage of coronavirus disease 2019 positive patients reported by each medical care provider (Spearman correlation = 0.20, 95 per cent confidence interval = 0.05-0.33). There was no association between geographical location and perceived increase in sudden sensorineural hearing loss (p = 0.38). CONCLUSION: The majority of respondents did not perceive an increase in the incidence of sudden sensorineural hearing loss during the coronavirus pandemic, regardless of geographical region.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural , Hearing Loss, Sudden , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/etiology , Hearing Loss, Sudden/epidemiology , Hearing Loss, Sudden/etiology , Humans , Pandemics
17.
BMJ Case Rep ; 15(7)2022 Jul 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1923171

ABSTRACT

It remains unclear how to effectively treat rare cases of sudden and recurrent hearing losses which might coincidently follow vaccination. We report the first case, to our knowledge, of systemic and local steroid administration to successfully treat sudden and recurrent left-ear hearing loss, respectively, following a second dose of the BNT162b2 COVID-19 mRNA vaccination which inflammatory response potentially affected an existing left intralabyrinthine schwannoma in a young male patient. This case highlights the importance and timing of intratympanic steroid treatment strategies to suppress the progressive symptoms and restore hearing to a stable condition, and therefore avoid permanent hearing loss which would otherwise demand a surgical removal of the schwannoma to improve vertigo and reconstitute artificial hearing.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Deafness , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural , Hearing Loss, Sudden , Neurilemmoma , BNT162 Vaccine , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/drug therapy , Hearing Loss, Sudden/diagnosis , Humans , Male , Steroids/therapeutic use , Vaccination
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL